To object to the development of 9 houses along Louth canal near to Louth Town Lock please email your objection letter to
Or ring 01507 613146
Ecological survey taken from the East District Lindsey website :5.2 PROTECTED SPECIES Amphibians 5.2.1 The nearest amphibian records provided by LERC are for great crested newt over 800m southwest of site, and common frog 910m northeast of site, to the north of Louth Canal. The only ponds shown on the Ordnance Survey map within 250m of the site are to the north, beyond the Louth Canal, which acts as a significant barrier to movement. There are no ponds on the site and none could be seen on adjacent land. Taken together, it is reasonably unlikely that amphibians make significant, if any, use of this site and so this group is not considered further. Reptiles 5.2.2 There are no reptile records for the local area since 1977 and, whilst the scrub and rough grassland present good opportunities for use by common reptile species, it is clear from aerial imagery that until fairly recently, the habitats on site were once much more formerly managed then they are now. This, and the poor habitat connectivity to the wider countryside, suggests that on balance, it is reasonably unlikely that reptiles make significant, if any, use of this site, and so this group is not considered further. [Client’s name] P a g e | 7 Bats 5.2.3 Small pre-fabricated concrete garages are not renowned for their use by bats and under BCT Guidelines, the garage is assessed as having negligible potential for use by bats due to the absence of suitable niches and regular human disturbance. Furthermore, no evidence of past or present use by bats was found during the survey. The garage is to be demolished to make way for the site access road. No further surveys are required with regard to bats, although protective measures may need to be put in place for nesting birds, depending on the demolition programme. 5.2.4 A mature Lombardy poplar on the north-eastern boundary has a rot hole 6m up the trunk. An ivy-clad willow along the canal path, just outside the development boundary, had rot damage on some branches and damage to the main stem. Both trees have potential for use by roosting bats and whilst the understanding is that neither is likely to be felled, there could still be an adverse impact on any bats using them. Both trees must be surveyed in season to determine whether they are used by bats and, if so, to evaluate any avoidance/mitigation measures. 5.2.5 The habitats on site are likely to provide foraging opportunities for local bats in their own right. However, of greater importance is the northern boundary tree line and the adjacent Louth Canal, which in combination are likely to provide both excellent foraging opportunities for bats and important linear habitat connectivity with the wider countryside, and one that is not currently subjected to high levels of light pollution. It is important to determine the effect the development could have on foraging and commuting bats in order to inform the site layout and any lighting scheme. This work should be integrated with the tree survey work in 4.3.4 to provide a combined assessment. Badgers 5.2.6 No evidence of badger activity or badger setts was recorded within the survey area or within 30m on adjacent land. No further work or mitigation is required for this species. Otter 5.2.7 No evidence of otter activity was recorded within the survey area. It is considered likely otter will use the canal as a movement corridor, given the large home range of this species and records from Louth Canal 1.3km east. Although otters are known to use bramble scrub as a laying up site, this habitat is adjacent to a busy public footpath with frequent dog walkers, which is likely to deter otter from resting on the south side of the canal. On balance, it is reasonably unlikely that otters make use of this site, and no further survey work or mitigation is required for this species. Birds 5.2.8 A limited range of common and widespread birds was recorded on the site and adjacent land, including starling, blackbird and woodpigeon. Starling is an S41 Species of Principal [Client’s name] P a g e | 8 Importance and Lincolnshire BAP priority species on account of its declining numbers (Collop, 2011). A full list of the birds recorded during survey is given in Appendix 1. A disused blackbird nest was also noted between the current access gate and neighbouring wall. The scrub, trees, hedgerow and garage have potential to support nesting birds, and future use can be expected in the breeding season. There is no potential for use by any of the specially protected Schedule- 1 species known to occur in the local area. 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 OVERVIEW 6.1.1 The development proposals include the construction of residential houses and the extension and widening of an existing driveway to create an access road. This will involve the demolition of a garage and the clearance of most vegetation on site, although many boundary trees will remain. The proposed site layout plan was not available at the time this report was written, so precise measures to mitigate any impacts and demonstrate how the development will generate biodiversity gain under national planning guidance will follow once the further survey work has been completed. 6.2 BATS 6.2.1 A minimum of two emergence/re-entry surveys will be undertaken (one dusk and one dawn) of both trees identified in this report as having bat roost potential. A minimum of two activity surveys will be undertaken in order to evaluate use of the site by foraging bats and in particular, any use of the northern boundary corridor. The surveys will be undertaken by suitably trained and experienced personnel between mid-May and mid-August and will follow methods set out in BCT Guidelines, 2016. The subsequent report will identify any issues and will provide clear and detailed advice on how any impacts can be successfully avoided or mitigated, together with timings. 6.3 BIRDS 6.3.1 The nests and eggs of all wild birds are protected by law (see Appendix 2). To avoid an offence, the demolition of the garage, together with any clearance of the hedgerows, trees and scrub, must be completed outside the breeding bird season, i.e. between the end of August and the beginning of March. If this is not possible, any vegetation to be cleared must be carefully searched in advance by an experienced ecologist. Any active nests must be cordoned off and the nest left undisturbed until the young have fledged. 6.3.2 To compensate for the loss of nesting habitat, 10 nest boxes must be incorporated into the development. An ecologist can prescribe the box types and the exact locations once the site [Client’s name] P a g e | 9 layout is known, but the retained trees along the northern tree boundary are likely to be the best area at present. 6.4 HEDGEHOG 6.4.1 Where possible, provision should also be made to allow for the free movement of hedgehogs between and through gardens. This can be achieved by leaving gaps along the base of boundary fencing. Gaps need be no bigger than 100mm wide by 80mm high. As with bird boxes, an ecologist can prescribe the optimal locations to place these gaps once the site layout is known.
There are frogs and hedgehogs in this area ( I get them in my garden and on my doorstep ) plus bluebells and ransoms. And a sparrowhawk and buzzard - failed to get a mention in the survey.